Here’s question 13 of our exam: 13. You fit a model of the form: y ∼ x + u full + (1 | group). The estimated coefficients are 2.5, 0.7, and 0.5 respectively for the intercept, x, and u full, with group and individual residual standard deviations estimated as 2.0 and 3.0 respectively. Write the […]

**Miscellaneous Statistics**category.

## Question 12 of our Applied Regression final exam (and solution to question 11)

Here’s question 12 of our exam: 12. In the regression above, suppose you replaced height in inches by height in centimeters. What would then be the intercept and slope of the regression? (One inch is 2.54 centimeters.) And the solution to question 11: 11. We defined a new variable based on weight (in pounds): heavy […]

## Question 11 of our Applied Regression final exam (and solution to question 10)

Here’s question 11 of our exam: 11. We defined a new variable based on weight (in pounds): heavy 200 and then ran a logistic regression, predicting “heavy” from height (in inches): glm(formula = heavy ~ height, family = binomial(link = “logit”)) coef.est coef.se (Intercept) -21.51 1.60 height 0.28 0.02 — n = 1984, k = […]

## Question 10 of our Applied Regression final exam (and solution to question 9)

Here’s question 10 of our exam: 10. For the above example, we then created indicator variables, age18_29, age30_44, age45_64, and age65up, for four age categories. We then fit a new regression: lm(formula = weight ~ age30_44 + age45_64 + age65up) coef.est coef.se (Intercept) 157.2 5.4 age30_44TRUE 19.1 7.0 age45_64TRUE 27.2 7.6 age65upTRUE 8.5 8.7 n […]

## Question 9 of our Applied Regression final exam (and solution to question 8)

Here’s question 9 of our exam: 9. We downloaded data with weight (in pounds) and age (in years) from a random sample of American adults. We created a new variables, age10 = age/10. We then fit a regression: lm(formula = weight ~ age10) coef.est coef.se (Intercept) 161.0 7.3 age10 2.6 1.6 n = 2009, k […]

## Question 7 of our Applied Regression final exam (and solution to question 6)

Here’s question 7 of our exam: 7. You conduct an experiment in which some people get a special get-out-the-vote message and others do not. Then you follow up with a sample, after the election, to see if they voted. If you follow up with 500 people, how large an effect would you be able to […]

## Question 6 of our Applied Regression final exam (and solution to question 5)

Here’s question 6 of our exam: 6. You are applying hierarchical logistic regression on a survey of 1500 people to estimate support for a federal jobs program. The model is fit using, as a state-level predictor, the Republican presidential vote in the state. Which of the following two statements is basically true? (a) Adding a […]

## Question 5 of our Applied Regression final exam (and solution to question 4)

Here’s question 5 of our exam: 5. You have just graded an exam with 28 questions and 15 students. You fit a logistic item-response model estimating ability, difficulty, and discrimination parameters. Which of the following statements are basically true? (a) If a question is answered correctly by students with low ability, but is missed by […]

## Question 4 of our Applied Regression final exam (and solution to question 3)

Here’s question 4 of our exam: 4. A researcher is imputing missing responses for income in a social survey of American households, using for the imputation a regression model given demographic variables. Which of the following two statements is basically true? (a) If you impute income deterministically using a fitted regression model (that is, imputing […]

## Question 3 of our Applied Regression final exam (and solution to question 2)

Here’s question 3 of our exam: Here is a fitted model from the Bangladesh analysis predicting whether a person with high-arsenic drinking water will switch wells, given the arsenic level in their existing well and the distance to the nearest safe well. glm(formula = switch ~ dist100 + arsenic, family=binomial(link=”logit”)) coef.est coef.se (Intercept) 0.00 0.08 […]

## Question 2 of our Applied Regression final exam (and solution to question 1)

Here’s question 2 of our exam: 2. A multiple-choice test item has four options. Assume that a student taking this question either knows the answer or does a pure guess. A random sample of 100 students take the item. 60% get it correct. Give an estimate and 95% confidence interval for the percentage in the […]

## Question 1 of our Applied Regression final exam

As promised, it’s time to go over the final exam of our applied regression class. It was an in-class exam, 3 hours for 15 questions. Here’s the first question on the test: 1. A randomized experiment is performed within a survey. 1000 people are contacted. Half the people contacted are promised a $5 incentive to […]

## My (remote) talk this Friday 3pm at the Department of Cognitive Science at UCSD

It was too much to do one more flight so I’ll do this one in (nearly) carbon-free style using hangout or skype. It’s 3pm Pacific time in CSB (Cognitive Science Building) 003 at the University of California, San Diego. This is what they asked for in the invite: Our Friday afternoon COGS200 series has been […]

## Concurve plots consonance curves, p-value functions, and S-value functions

Andrew Vigotsky writes: Now that abandoning significance and embracing uncertainty is in the air, we think this package, which runs in R or Stata, may be of interest to both you and your readers. Concurve plots consonance curves, p-value functions, and S-value functions to allow readers and researchers to get a better feel of the […]

## Neural nets vs. regression models

Eliot Johnson writes: I have a question concerning papers comparing two broad domains of modeling: neural nets and statistical models. Both terms are catch-alls, within each of which there are, quite obviously, multiple subdomains. For instance, NNs could include ML, DL, AI, and so on. While statistical models should include panel data, time series, hierarchical […]

## Vigorous data-handling tied to publication in top journals among public heath researchers

Gur Huberman points us to this news article by Nicholas Bakalar, “Vigorous Exercise Tied to Macular Degeneration in Men,” which begins: A new study suggests that vigorous physical activity may increase the risk for vision loss, a finding that has surprised and puzzled researchers. Using questionnaires, Korean researchers evaluated physical activity among 211,960 men and […]

## A debate about effect-size variation in psychology: Simmons and Simonsohn; McShane, Böckenholt, and Hansen; Judd and Kenny; and Stanley and Doucouliagos

A couple weeks ago, Uri Simonsohn and Joe Simmons sent me and others a note that they were writing a blog post citing some of our work and asking for us to point out anything that we find “inaccurate, unfair, snarky, misleading, or in want of a change for any reason.” I took a quick […]

## Ballot order update

Darren Grant writes: Thanks for bringing my work on ballot order effects to the attention of a wider audience via your recent blog post. The final paper, slightly modified from the version you posted, was published last year in Public Choice. Like you, I am not wedded to traditional hypothesis testing, but think it is […]

## Wanted: Statistical success stories

Bill Harris writes: Sometime when you get a free moment, it might be great to publish a post that links to good, current exemplars of analyses. There’s a current discussion about RCTs on a program evaluation mailing list I monitor. I posted links to your power=0.06 post and your Type S and Type M post, […]

## No, its not correct to say that you can be 95% sure that the true value will be in the confidence interval

Hans van Maanen writes: Mag ik je weer een statistische vraag voorleggen? If I ask my frequentist statistician for a 95%-confidence interval, I can be 95% sure that the true value will be in the interval she just gave me. My visualisation is that she filled a bowl with 100 intervals, 95 of which do […]