His plagiarism unambiguously violates the USC Integrity and Accountability Code:
Our Integrity and Accountability Code is anchored to USC’s Unifying Values and aligns our everyday decisions with the institution’s mission and compliance obligations. The Code is a vital resource for all faculty and staff throughout USC, including those at Keck Medicine at USC and the Keck School of Medicine.
The university policy continues:
To protect our reputation and promote our mission, every Trojan must do their part and act with integrity in our learning, teaching and research activities. This includes . . .
Never tolerating acts of plagiarism, falsification or fabrication of data, or other forms of academic and research misconduct.
I guess his defense would be that he didn’t “tolerate” these acts of plagiarism, because he didn’t know that they happened. But that would imply that he did not read his own book, which violates another part of that policy:
Making sure that all documentation and published findings are accurate, complete and unbiased.
Also it implies he was not telling the truth when he said the following in his book: “I went out and spoke to the amazing scientists around the world who do these kinds of experiments, and what I uncovered was astonishing.” Unless of course he never said this and his ghostwriter made it up, in which case he didn’t read that part either.
At some point you have to take responsibility for what is written under your name, right? I understand that in collaborative work it’s possible for coauthors to include errors or even fabrications without the other authors knowing, but he was the sole author of this book.
As the official USC document says:
Plagiarism is the appropriation of another person’s ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit.
Here’s what the USC medical school professor said:
I am grateful that my collaborator has confirmed that I did not contribute to, nor was I aware of, any of the plagiarized or non-attributed passages in my books . . . I followed standard protocols and my attorney and I received several verbal [sic] and written assurances from this highly respected individual that she had run the book through multiple software checks to ensure proper attributions.
Ummmm . . . what about the “long sections of a chapter on the cardiac health of giraffes [that] appear to have been lifted from a 2016 blog post on the website of a South African safari company titled, ‘The Ten Craziest Facts You Should Know About A Giraffe'”? That didn’t look odd at all??
My “I have run the book through multiple software checks” T-shirt has people asking a lot of questions already answered by my shirt.
Also weird that the ghostwriter gave an assurance that she had run “multiple software checks.” This sounds like the author of record and his attorney (!) already had their suspicions. Who goes around asking for “several verbal and written assurances”? I get it: the author of record didn’t just pay for the words in the book; he also paid for an assurance that any plagiarism wouldn’t get caught.
I’m completely serious about this question:
What if a student at the USC medical school (oh, sorry, the “Keck School of Medicine”) were to hand in a plagiarized final paper? Would that student be kicked out of the program? What if the student said that he didn’t know about the plagiarism because he’d hired a ghostwriter to write the paper? And the ghostwriter supplied several verbal and written assurances that she had run the book through multiple software checks. Then would it be ok?
I have no personal interest in this one; I’m not going to file a formal complaint with USC or whatever. I just think it’s funny that USC doesn’t seem to care. What ever happened to “To protect our reputation and promote our mission . . .”? “Every Trojan,” indeed. To paraphrase Leona Helmsley, only the little people have to follow the rules, huh?
Why this matters
Junk science pollutes our discourse, Greshamly overwhelming the real stuff out there. Confident bullshitters suck up attention, along with TV, radio (NPR, of course), and space on airport bookshelves across the nation. When this regurgitated crap gets endorsements by Jane Goodall, Al Gore, Murray Gell-Mann, and other celebrities, it crowds out whatever is really being learned about the world.
There’s room for pop science writing and general health advice, for sure. This giraffe crap ain’t it.
On the other hand
Let’s get real. All this is much better than professors who engage in actual dangerous behavior such as conspiracy theorizing, election denial, medical hype, etc. I guess what bothers me about this USC case is the smugness of it all. The professors who push baseless conspiracy theories or dubious cures typically have an air of desperation to them. OK, not all of them. But often. Even Wansink at the height of his fame had a sort of overkinetic nervous aspect. And presumably they believe their own hype. Even those business school professors who made up data think they’re doing it in support of some true theory, right? But USC dude had to have known he was contracting out his reputation, just so he could get one more burst of fame with “The Ten Craziest Facts You Should Know About A Giraffe” or whatever. In any case, yeah, Alex Jones is a zillion times worse so let’s keep our perspective here.
Also, the USC doc is a strong supporter of vaccines, so he’s using his reputation for good rather than trying to use political polarization to score political points. I guess he can forget about moving to Stanford.
Hi Andrew: I think the UCLA references at the bottom might be typos. Shouldn’t those be USC? As far the rest of the blog goes, this is “The Ten Craziest Facts You Should Know About David Agus AKA Forrest Gumpain: Once you open a box of plagiarism, you never know what you are going to get”.
Typo fixed; thanks.
I queried my search engine and came up with the following:
1. Several books by Agus were found to contain plagiarised content.
2. Agus’s ghostwriter has a rather long list of people she writes for.
3. There have been no articles published on this matter since the end of March. Therefore, I do not believe that USC will act on this.
4. It should be noted that the day before the book was published for everyone, it was pulled to add additional sources. The plagiarised parts were found in the pre-release edition. I have not seen any article describing how and how well the corrections worked. Because I find it hard to imagine them writing ‘According to Wikipedia…’ when Wikipedia was one of the non-cited sources!
Source: https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2023-03-17/usc-david-agus-books-plagiarism
>What if a student at the USC medical school (oh, sorry, the “Keck School of Medicine”) were to hand in a plagiarized final paper? Would that student be kicked out of the program?
I can answer this with some authority since my wife handles a Masters program at Keck and this happens several times a year, and the answer is NO they wouldn’t be kicked out. They’d be referred to the academic integrity department and those people would give a slap on the wrist, and then in several cases the plagiarism continues unabated. I think my wife has had instances of 3-4 times a student re-offending.
Students usually receive an F for the assignment and maybe an F in the class, but are not removed from the program normally.
Also the head of the Zilkha Neurogenesis institute is running a $30M clinical trial on the backs of falsified evidence he heavily and repeatedly pressured his underlings to manufacture.
https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-concerns-possible-drug-risks-should-stop-stroke-trial-whistleblowers-say
Wow! That linked article is something to read—and very upsetting. And, it’s current. That issue of Science has not yet arrived in my mailbox.
Plagiarized final papers “several times a year” ? Wow — that’s amazing (and depressing). I suppose the positive spin is that USC has a consistent code of ethics for students as well as faculty.
From one of the above-quoted materials: “To protect our reputation and promote our mission, every Trojan must do their part and act with integrity in our learning, teaching and research activities.”
I guess that if there’s no reputation left to protect, there’s no longer any reason for every Trojan to do their part . . .
Since I have a reputational cost from having a USC PhD maybe I should file a complaint. Then again, I’m not sure it will remedy the reputation costs from having a federal prosecution of Hollywood celebrities or any of the weird dean resignation scandals and racism panics that happened while I was there. The original advisor they assigned to me appeared to be a conspiracist who had never met a theory he didn’t like, so my particular graduate school situation circa 2015 involved dealing with someone tenured in academia who actually had tons in common with Alex Jones. As instructor there I had the task of sending a couple violators of plagiarism out to the school’s judicial bureaucracy for fact determinations, which I suppose had its pluses and minuses. Generally it was not a pleasant experience to have to correct the children for their wrongs (rather, send them off to the authorities for someone else to adjudicate) while many of the adults above me looked like absolute buffoons. But I guess it’s better to have comedy than tragedy.
Same same.
Why would any school kick anyone out over academics?
Kicking students out is bad bad bad for adminstrators. Zero upside to that. It would take a generation or longer to undermine the rep of a school like USC from a couple of plagerizers a year. But if the admins go booting students out it affects their bottom line right away: what wealthy parent is going to send their dumbshit kid and pay full ride to a school that the kid might get booted from for cheating – much less donate for the new stadium or quarterback or “athletic assistant” women for the football team?
Oh no. Not gonna happen.
If we want better results in education, penalties for cheating aren’t the positive line-the-admins-pockets way! What we need is more effort from faculty to inject the knowledge into the brains of the social justice certified post-exam student body so they don’t have to: a) expend any effort; or b) be troubled by fears of not being number one. Hey wait! Yeah, that’s it!! Just flip the classroom!! Cake!!
Universities don’t care if faculty plagiarizes. The Princeton historian Kevin Kruse is the posterchild of that. Another example is the plagiarism of then-UPenn sociology faculty Elijah Anderson’s work in a 2005 book by then-UPenn sociology faculty Kathryn Edin and Maria Kefalas at St. Joseph’s University. Before the matter became public, Edin and Kefalas had admitted that they had not properly acknowledged Anderson’s work and signed a formal agreement to add proper references to it in subsequent editions of their book. Those changes have never been made. Edin and Kefalas suffered no sanctions. Edin was promoted to full professor the year after. Before this case, it had been revealed that Kefalas’ first book included plagiarized material.
Gb:
Wow. I’d never heard about the Anderson/Edin/Kefalas story. A quick google leads to this exchange from 2005 which is interesting to me, in part because I know many of the people involved! This news report from that time is interesting too.