Survey Statistics: beyond balancing

Andrew’s talk today about the history of political polling includes:

19. Off-year elections and party balancing

Bafumi et al. (2010) describe balancing as:

the electorate boosts its support for the out party at midterm from a desire for balance in terms of ideology or policy.

Andrew has blogged about this a bunch, e.g. “What I learned from those tough 538 commenters” (2010). Funnily, it includes an example of balancing:

As a reader, when you see someone write that Person X is wrong, one of your first reactions is gonna be, “Hey, maybe not! Let me give X a fair shake.”

Let’s try to understand what all the fuss was about. “Person X” is “Self-described ‘political operative’ Les Francis”, who says in 2010:

I don’t need any polls to tell me that Republicans will do well in November. The “out” party almost always shows significant gains in the first midterm election of a new President.

Yup. Andrew wanted to add that beyond this balancing effect, polls do still help to predict midterm elections. Let:

  • polls = % Democrat in polls in midterm years asking respondents which party (“generic”, not a specific candidate) they intend to vote for
  • vote = % Democrat in elections in midterm years
  • president = 1 if Democrat is in office, −1 if Republican is in office

Bafumi et al. (2010) fit regression models:

vote = b0 + b1 * president + b2 * polls + error

Both coefficients are “statistically significant”.

  • b1 is negative: Democrats do better in midterms when there is a Republican president, and vice versa.
  • b2 is positive: polls predict election results.

Bafumi et al. (2010) Table 4 shows that b2 doesn’t change much based on the time of the poll, but b1 gets closer to 0 as the polls are closer to election day. Figure 3 shows this regression:

As Andrew points out, based on Bafumi et al. (2010), an election prediction model with both president and polls does better than a prediction model with president alone.

p.s. This Survey Statistics blog series always includes a photo of the polar bear on trail. As Nick Tierney noted on bsky, this may be unexpected. But in this post, there is a connection in that Joseph Bafumi is a professor at Dartmouth, home of part of the Appalachian Trail.

2 thoughts on “Survey Statistics: beyond balancing

  1. Quote from the blog post: “p.s. This Survey Statistics blog series always includes a photo of the polar bear on trail. As Nick Tierney noted on bsky, this may be unexpected. But in this post, there is a connection in that Joseph Bafumi is a professor at Dartmouth, home of part of the Appalachian Trail.”

    And there is of course (?) a further different connection between the title and content of the blog post (balancing) and the (title of the) photo of the polar bear balancing on a trail marker. Also, the polar bear may not be balancing when it comes to polling, but the polar bear is balancing when it come to the trail pole. I’d say that’s all the more reason to warrent the inclusion of the picture!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *