Roughly speaking, Bayesian Workflow is to Bayesian Data Analysis in 2026 what Bayesian Data Analysis was to earlier Bayesian books in 1995: it builds upon everything that came before.

With Bayesian Data Analysis, the big steps forward were:

• Going beyond Bayesian inference to also consider Bayesian model building (as a researcher, you construct the model, it isn’t just given to you as in a textbook), model checking (breaking through the absolutely horrible attitude, common to Bayesians in the early 1990s, that the model was “subjective” and thus should not be checked), and model improvement (continuous model expansion, not the misguided idea of assigning posterior probabilities).
• Going beyond simple conjugate models. BDA had lots of hierarchical models, also lots of computational tools so that you could fit the models you want by putting them together from understandable components. And I like how we had a clear separation between modeling and computing. The model comes first, then you figure out how to compute it. Or you set up a model that works within your computational constraints.
• A Bayesian approach to sampling and causal inference. This was Rubin’s framework in which unobserved units in the population and unobserved causal outcomes are treated as missing data and are part of a joint probability model. We worked this out in chapter 7 of BDA (which became chapter 8 in the third edition of the book).
• Lots of live examples. Not just “real-data examples,” but problems we’d directly worked on. This motivated us and I think it gave our readers a sense of how Bayesian methods worked not just in theory but in applied problems.
• A pragmatic view of probability as a measurable quantity. That’s right there in chapter 1. Bayesian methods are not the product of a philosophical stance; they’re a way to connect models and data using probability.

I could go on and on, but for that I can refer you to the Bayesian Data Analysis book.

And these are the key innovations of Bayesian Workflow:

• Going beyond Bayesian data analysis (model building, inference, model checking, and model expansion) to consider the larger process of statistical modeling, including comparisons of multiple models fit to a single dataset.
• A fuller use of informative priors. This is a big deal. In BDA we still had a bit of the Bayesian cringe going on. One reason we’ve moved toward stronger priors is that the replication crisis has taught us that the amount of prior information available in any given problem is often approximately the same as the information coming from an experiment (see here, for example). Informative priors also fit our increased focus on generative modeling, and we’re doing a lot more prior predictive checking to understand the implications of our models.
• More integration between modeling, data analysis, and computing. One way to see this is that the Bayesian Workflow webpage has the code to run all our examples. We also have lots of code snippets in the text as a way of demonstrating the way in which coding is central to our statistical workflow.
• Lots more live examples. It’s been 30 years since BDA first came out. One reason that Bayesian Workflow has 11 authors is that different collaborators worked on different examples (but the three principal authors read through the entire book, so the general approach should remain coherent).
• Simulation-based experimentation. This is something my colleagues have been doing more and more over the years. At its most basic, simulation-based experimentation provides a best-case baseline for statistical methods: if you can’t recover your quantities of interest with sufficient accuracy under ideal conditions (when your data are simulated from the model you’re fitting), then you know you’re in trouble. And often this is the case! Beyond that, we can simulate from one model and fit another, and see what happens. Simulation experiments aren’t always so easy to construct, as they involve specifying the entire data-generation process. But we think this is effort worth expending, as it involves thinking about the problem you’re working on.

I could go on and on, but for that I can refer you to the Bayesian Workflow book.

And now for the reviews

But you don’t have to trust me on this! Just listen to some of the eminent statisticians and educators who’ve reviewed our book:

Bin Yu (University of California):

An outstanding, protocol-driven guide for Bayesian data analysis, Bayesian Workflow by Gelman, Vehtari, McElreath and co-authors delivers a practical and comprehensive framework for iterative modeling, emphasizing simulation, diagnostic checks, and rigorous empirical validation, and with a long and impressive list of case studies. By treating data analysis as a structured, verifiable workflow, it provides an indispensable toolkit for diagnosing model failures, refining priors, and building reliable data analysis systems for reproducible conclusions, useful for beginning and veteran data analysts alike.

David Spiegelhalter (Cambridge University):

This is not a typical methods textbook, but instead it guides the reader through the whole process of fitting, critiquing and adapting statistical models to real-world problems. It is full of the accumulated wisdom of skilled practitioners, teaching through demonstration rather than theory, with both basic and highly sophisticated examples. I strongly recommend this book to statisticians who really want to understand what they can learn from their data.

Brad Efron (Stanford University):

A bravura performance…Gelman, Vehtari, McElreath and friends develop in detail a practical Bayesian data analysis workflow, from acquisition to final report, including full computational guidance.

Christian Robert (University of Paris):

This original, thought-provoking, and transformative book is much much more than an implementation manual for Bayesian Data Analysis, even though it shares almost the same perspective. (The first sentence of the book states that the authors’ “conceptions of statistical practice, and of Bayesian statistics, have changed over the years”.) By providing a modus vivendi for undertaking Bayesian modelling from scratch in realistic settings where models are not magicked out of the blue, the authors explicit and rationalise the many steps required by such a bottom-up modelling protocol (“not a checklist, not a cookbook”, and not a flowchart!) in real situations. The contents read very well and very smoothly, with a seamless conjunction of intuition, modelling advices, computational details, and comparison tools. While unsurprisingly Bayesian, the perspective adopted therein remains both open and inclusive, with a welcome humility about the limitations and challenges of Bayesian workflows. This book should thus appeal to and profit a wide variety of readers, as providing guidance through an extensive collection of highly detailed examples, with shared code and exercises.

Rohan Alexander (University of Toronto):

Some statistics books show you how to beat an egg, others are recipe books: if this, then that style. This book teaches you how to cook. Written by authors who established so much of how we do Bayesian statistics, this new book is an indispensable guide for analyzing data in a trustworthy way. It walks you through the actual steps involved in building models to explore and understand datasets. Part 4 is particularly excellent – the authors provide many end-to-end case studies that will be useful for both practitioners and students. It highlights the value of their workflow-based approach. Filled with chatty asides, the book introduces the Bayesian workflow to a broad audience. It embraces the frustrations and complexities of actually doing Bayesian statistics and provides specific guidance throughout. Each chapter contains exercises and it could be the basis of an upper-year undergraduate course, or a first-year grad course, in applied statistics. It will be used for many years to come.

Mine Doğucu (Harvard University):

What makes Bayesian Workflow so exceptional is how it seamlessly pairs profound ideas about modeling with the adoption of modern computational practice. By centering the messy, iterative process of modeling through real-world case studies, the authors reject rigid cookbooks and checklists in favor of building deep situational awareness. Because the ideas are so clearly articulated and deeply applied, this book serves as an invaluable pedagogical resource. With its practical exercises, individual chapters or the text as a whole can easily be integrated into upper-level undergraduate or graduate courses, while also remaining accessible for self-guided readers. It is an indispensable read for anyone with foundational knowledge in Bayesian methods, regardless of whether they are applied practitioners, software developers, or methodologists.

You might also be interested in the journal issue on statistical workflow that we recently edited for the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society.

Again, here’s Bayesian Workflow on Amazon, here’s the publisher’s website, and here’s our website with data, code, and lots more.

Enjoy.