My recent article with Xian and Judith. In English.

Interested readers can try to figure out which parts were written by each of the three authors (recognizing that each of us edited the whole thing).

Posted by Andrew on 14 December 2010, 11:14 am

My recent article with Xian and Judith. In English.

Interested readers can try to figure out which parts were written by each of the three authors (recognizing that each of us edited the whole thing).

## Recent Comments

- confused on An open letter expressing concerns regarding the statistical analysis and data integrity of a recently published and publicized paper
- Eric B Rasmusen on An open letter expressing concerns regarding the statistical analysis and data integrity of a recently published and publicized paper
- Eric B Rasmusen on An open letter expressing concerns regarding the statistical analysis and data integrity of a recently published and publicized paper
- Zad on An open letter expressing concerns regarding the statistical analysis and data integrity of a recently published and publicized paper
- Robert Johnston on Hydroxychloroquine update
- paul alper on An open letter expressing concerns regarding the statistical analysis and data integrity of a recently published and publicized paper
- Paul Hayes on An open letter expressing concerns regarding the statistical analysis and data integrity of a recently published and publicized paper
- Martha (Smith) on This controversial hydroxychloroquine paper: What’s Lancet gonna do about it?
- Martha (Smith) on Blast from the past
- Philippe on An open letter expressing concerns regarding the statistical analysis and data integrity of a recently published and publicized paper
- Joshua on This is not a post about remdesivir.
- Andrew on An open letter expressing concerns regarding the statistical analysis and data integrity of a recently published and publicized paper
- Joshua on This is not a post about remdesivir.
- Carlos Ungil on An open letter expressing concerns regarding the statistical analysis and data integrity of a recently published and publicized paper
- Carlos Ungil on This controversial hydroxychloroquine paper: What’s Lancet gonna do about it?
- Dale Lehman on This controversial hydroxychloroquine paper: What’s Lancet gonna do about it?
- Andrew on Age-period-cohort analysis.
- Carlos Ungil on This controversial hydroxychloroquine paper: What’s Lancet gonna do about it?
- Georgi Momekov on This controversial hydroxychloroquine paper: What’s Lancet gonna do about it?
- Michael Nelson on Age-period-cohort analysis.

## Categories

Very off topic, but have you seen this?

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/201…

(Blogging about) climatologists doing MCMC modeling.

I already read the article! Robert posted in his blog earlier than you. And I tryed to figure out which part was written by each one. However, since I've never read anything by Rousseau, I couldn't figure out what was written by her. But I found quite easy to identify you and Robert contribution in the article (though I may be totally wrong).

Distinguished Gelman styles can be found at:

references to posterior predictive checks; Bayesian not being subjective, references to hierarchical model (p. 10), argument about using the data twice (due it may be a Robert argument as well)… And my guess is that some exclamation marks are due to you as well! (footnoe on page 4, and "!" on page 11).

Distinguished Robert Styles are:

Sound defense of Bayesianism and to take Bayesianism seriously, Bayes factor as a way to compare models, section 4 in general, references to improper priors…

Am I more right than wrong on this?

This is pretty much what I guessed as well. I found it a bit odd to read a paper with AG as a co-author defending Bayes factors as a useful technique.