Posted by Andrew on 19 July 2007, 7:47 pm

## Recent Comments

- Andrew on The publication asymmetry: What happens if the New England Journal of Medicine publishes something that you think is wrong?
- Clyde Schechter on The publication asymmetry: What happens if the New England Journal of Medicine publishes something that you think is wrong?
- Phil on We’re done with our Applied Regression final exam (and solution to question 15)
- Koray on Algorithmic bias and social bias
- Keith O'Rourke on We’re done with our Applied Regression final exam (and solution to question 15)
- Jordan Anaya on The publication asymmetry: What happens if the New England Journal of Medicine publishes something that you think is wrong?
- Daniel Lakeland on We’re done with our Applied Regression final exam (and solution to question 15)
- Daniel Lakeland on The publication asymmetry: What happens if the New England Journal of Medicine publishes something that you think is wrong?
- Willem on The publication asymmetry: What happens if the New England Journal of Medicine publishes something that you think is wrong?
- Jordan Anaya on Let’s publish everything.
- Martha (Smith) on Naomi Wolf and David Brooks
- Keith O'Rourke on We’re done with our Applied Regression final exam (and solution to question 15)
- jim on Naomi Wolf and David Brooks
- Andrew on We’re done with our Applied Regression final exam (and solution to question 15)
- george on We’re done with our Applied Regression final exam (and solution to question 15)
- Andrew on Naomi Wolf and David Brooks
- Roger on Naomi Wolf and David Brooks
- Daniel Lakeland on How statistics is used to crush (scientific) dissent.
- Daniel Lakeland on How statistics is used to crush (scientific) dissent.
- Sameera Daniels on How statistics is used to crush (scientific) dissent.

## Categories

I find that counterintuitive, but maybe true anyway?

"Has anyone explained to you why this is intuitively obvious?"

-George Evans, University of Oregon Econ. Prof.

That's still one of my favorite jokes.