Skip to primary content

Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

Main menu

  • Home
  • Authors
  • Blogs We Read
  • Books
  • Sponsors

Post navigation

Standardizing regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations Jay Goodliffe’s comments on standardizing regression inputs

Interesting bioethics blog

Posted on June 22, 2006 9:09 AM by Andrew

Following the link from Jon Baron’s site, I found this interesting blog from the American Journal of Bioethics.

This entry was posted in Miscellaneous Science by Andrew. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Art
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Bayesian Statistics
  • Causal Inference
  • Decision Analysis
  • Economics
  • Jobs
  • Literature
  • Miscellaneous Science
  • Miscellaneous Statistics
  • Multilevel Modeling
  • Obituaries
  • Papers
  • Political Science
  • Public Health
  • Sociology
  • Sports
  • Stan
  • Statistical Computing
  • Statistical Graphics
  • Teaching
  • Zombies
  1. Jessica Hullman on Forking paths in LLMs for data analysisJuly 18, 2026 1:49 PM

    If I understand the comment, you're arguing that any automated decision rule that optimizes according to some historical distribution is…

  2. Daniel Lakeland on Supplement that alphabetized display with another graph showing the states in a more informative order.July 18, 2026 1:45 PM

    Joshua, I'd suggest that at this point in time we've exhausted the capacity of the comment section to contain the…

  3. Phil on More scientists in the Epstein files, including a roboticist and an ESP researcherJuly 18, 2026 1:27 PM

    "Never meet your heroes" is a common saying that recognizes that even admirable people have major flaws. But now I'm…

  4. Daniel Lakeland on Supplement that alphabetized display with another graph showing the states in a more informative order.July 18, 2026 1:26 PM

    Joshua. It's been a long exchange, but if you look back somewhere as soon as I realized that Sweden wasn't…

  5. Tris Simondsen on Forking paths in LLMs for data analysisJuly 18, 2026 1:18 PM

    David - while the outcomes you describe are certainly visceral, the core issue is structural rather than purely sensational. Anoneuoid…

  6. Joshua on More scientists in the Epstein files, including a roboticist and an ESP researcherJuly 18, 2026 12:27 PM

    Andrew - Yeah it's actually a big thing. There is a whole series of videos called "The Telepathy Tapes," where…

  7. Anoneuoid on Forking paths in LLMs for data analysisJuly 18, 2026 12:10 PM

    This is handled via independent replication and checking precise predictions. Whether done by an ai or human is not relevant.…

  8. Andrew on More scientists in the Epstein files, including a roboticist and an ESP researcherJuly 18, 2026 11:21 AM

    Joshua: Wow. The autistic telepath thing is pretty stupid. I guess maybe the Freakonomics and Sean Carroll podcasts will start…

  9. Joshua on More scientists in the Epstein files, including a roboticist and an ESP researcherJuly 18, 2026 11:06 AM

    An interesting (to me) connection. Rogan et al.are big time into the Epstein conspiracy theories and also they're into the…

  10. Andrew on More scientists in the Epstein files, including a roboticist and an ESP researcherJuly 18, 2026 10:55 AM

    Jen: I hate to tell you this, but my media presence is pretty low, and I don't think this blog…

  11. Andrew on More scientists in the Epstein files, including a roboticist and an ESP researcherJuly 18, 2026 10:53 AM

    Anon: Yes, he's made major research contributions and is the coauthor of an amazing and influential book! Also he has…

  12. Jen on More scientists in the Epstein files, including a roboticist and an ESP researcherJuly 18, 2026 10:52 AM

    Is this being used to distract us from the politicians who abused children?

  13. Jessica Hullman on More scientists in the Epstein files, including a roboticist and an ESP researcherJuly 18, 2026 10:02 AM

    Schank spent awhile at Northwestern too, and was the advisor of several of my colleagues back at Yale, who have…

  14. Anonymous on More scientists in the Epstein files, including a roboticist and an ESP researcherJuly 18, 2026 9:55 AM

    I wonder if that Donald Rubin fellow has any interesting connections?

  15. Jessica Hullman on Herman ChernoffJuly 18, 2026 9:53 AM

    Oh, I missed that!

  16. Howard Edwards on Herman ChernoffJuly 18, 2026 6:51 AM

    And he wrote the seminal paper on the sequential design of experiments in AnnMathStat way back in 1959. I met…

  17. David, a Bostonian in Tokyo on Forking paths in LLMs for data analysisJuly 18, 2026 3:16 AM

    "The danger I am warning against is the growing industry trend of fully autonomous AI “data agents”." Agreed that said…

  18. John Mashey on Herman ChernoffJuly 18, 2026 2:09 AM

    "Chernoff suggested we buy his house in Brookline" It might have been a good deal, if anything like following example:…

  19. Andrew on Herman ChernoffJuly 18, 2026 12:43 AM

    Jessica: Yes, see discussion in comments above.

  20. Jessica Hullman on Herman ChernoffJuly 17, 2026 9:30 PM

    I just realized he was the creator of Chernoff faces, a glyph design where you map statistics to features of…

  21. Joshua on Supplement that alphabetized display with another graph showing the states in a more informative order.July 17, 2026 7:02 PM

    Daniel - I just realized that I mis-nested that link in the wrong location. Here's the link: https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2026/06/26/dont-alphabetize/#comment-2416524 But while…

  22. Tris Simondsen on Forking paths in LLMs for data analysisJuly 17, 2026 6:40 PM

    Dale, appreciate the reply. The good news is that we are in complete agreement! In fact, the way you are…

  23. Dale Lehman on Forking paths in LLMs for data analysisJuly 17, 2026 5:57 PM

    I can understand little of what you have written (not a criticism unless you choose to view it as such…

  24. Dale Lehman on Herman ChernoffJuly 17, 2026 5:14 PM

    I can't speak to whether he was kidding. But he showed a scatterplot with Chernoff faces for select data points,…

  25. Tris Simondsen on Forking paths in LLMs for data analysisJuly 17, 2026 5:06 PM

    I just left a comment on your June 27th Substack post with a similar thought so this would be repetitive…

  26. Joshua on Supplement that alphabetized display with another graph showing the states in a more informative order.July 17, 2026 5:04 PM

    Daniel - (apologies in advance for the length. I'm trying to do a lot here...) On the CFR point: I'll…

  27. Phil on Herman ChernoffJuly 17, 2026 4:44 PM

    Chernoff faces are indeed terrible, but even worse is Tufte's suggestion that since each face is symmetrical you should follow…

  28. Shane Tutwiler on Herman ChernoffJuly 17, 2026 1:57 PM

    Thanks for sharing! That's a fascinating scenario, and good caveat to keep in mind.

  29. Andrew on Herman ChernoffJuly 17, 2026 12:56 PM

    Oh, yes, that's cool too. I didn't think about it because it doesn't relate so much to my work. Although…

  30. Anonymous on Herman ChernoffJuly 17, 2026 11:52 AM

    I heard of him through the Chernoff bound.

  31. Andrew on Herman ChernoffJuly 17, 2026 10:54 AM

    Dale: Oh, those Chernoff faces are an absolutely terrible idea. I didn't even mention them in my post because I'd…

  32. Dale Lehman on Herman ChernoffJuly 17, 2026 10:25 AM

    I have only heard of Chernoff through exposure to Chernoff faces (which I saw in a Tufte book). I thought…

  33. Andrew on Herman ChernoffJuly 17, 2026 10:09 AM

    Shane: I agree. That said, sometimes the Bayesian posterior distribution is worse than the maximum likelihood estimate. This can happen…

  34. Shane Tutwiler on Herman ChernoffJuly 17, 2026 10:01 AM

    From page 92 of your dissertation: "This section shows that the Bayesian estimate, even with the wrong prior distribution, is…

  35. shira on Survey Statistics: quantifying uncertainty in ranked choice voting pollsJuly 17, 2026 9:17 AM

    Thanks, John ! True, with ranked data there are a lot more analyses you can do than with a single…

  36. shira on Survey Statistics: quantifying uncertainty in ranked choice voting pollsJuly 17, 2026 9:16 AM

    Thank you, Mark ! Great point, the paper focuses on instant runoff presumably because it is the most common form…

  37. Daniel Lakeland on “Making Statistics Work: Information Theory and Bayesian Inference”July 16, 2026 3:47 PM

    Anonymous: You really can't "check" the Bayesian probability distribution over say the measurement errors of the time measurements. That's because…

  38. Daniel Lakeland on Supplement that alphabetized display with another graph showing the states in a more informative order.July 16, 2026 3:13 PM

    Joshua, I don't really disagree with you about the questions involved in interrogating the mechanism. We *should* ask questions like…

  39. Joshua on Supplement that alphabetized display with another graph showing the states in a more informative order.July 16, 2026 3:05 PM

    Reading back what I wrote I realize I was being too categorical in describing the differences between the physics and…

  40. Elin on A ranked-choice election in Maine: Using voting data to understand preferencesJuly 16, 2026 2:37 PM

    In the ranked choice primary for mayor this spring it was very interesting that there was lots of messaging that…

  41. Joshua on Supplement that alphabetized display with another graph showing the states in a more informative order.July 16, 2026 2:25 PM

    Daniel – Before turning to the substance of your reply, I want to say something about the arc of this…

  42. Carlos Ungil on “Making Statistics Work: Information Theory and Bayesian Inference”July 16, 2026 2:14 PM

    > Regarding terminology, I recommend replacing “belief” with “model,” not with “knowledge.” One of the two links to explain why…

  43. Anonymous on “Making Statistics Work: Information Theory and Bayesian Inference”July 16, 2026 1:42 PM

    Daniel, I understand now why Andrew likes calling those things “models”, because they are basically predictions about reality. Even though…

  44. Anoneuoid on “Archaeology can’t give social scientists population or GDP, but here are some things we can measure that might be useful for social science.”July 16, 2026 1:12 PM

    How does that differ from eg rain falling falling on top of a mountain/hill and predicting where it will eventually…

  45. Daniel Lakeland on “Making Statistics Work: Information Theory and Bayesian Inference”July 16, 2026 12:27 PM

    Anonymous. The subjectivity of actually rolling balls down the inclined plane is not super high. But when it comes to…

  46. AAAnonymous on Is fabricating data worse than fabricating results? Is failing to correct a known false report more or less serious than making the false report in the first place?July 16, 2026 12:03 PM

    Quote from above: "As a side note, when reading the blog post by Mr. Nosek on the Center for Open…

  47. John Hall on A ranked-choice election in Maine: Using voting data to understand preferencesJuly 16, 2026 10:31 AM

    My comment on the prior ranked choice post was kind of hinting that Condorcet is better. You address one potential…

  48. Andrew on “Making Statistics Work: Information Theory and Bayesian Inference”July 16, 2026 8:57 AM

    Other: I accept that you are confused. It's hard for writing to be clear to everyone, in part because different…

  49. Other Andrew on “Making Statistics Work: Information Theory and Bayesian Inference”July 16, 2026 6:21 AM

    I never said you were gatekeeping based on price of your books or articles (it is commendable that they are…

  50. Robin Blythe on “Making Statistics Work: Information Theory and Bayesian Inference”July 16, 2026 4:23 AM

    Many thanks Bob, don't think I've read most of these myself so I'm keen to learn something as well. Cheers.

Proudly powered by WordPress