Thanks in advance!

**P.S.** Jaime Ashander sent in a photo. Thanks, Jaime!

Posted by Andrew on 10 March 2018, 9:53 pm

Thanks in advance!

**P.S.** Jaime Ashander sent in a photo. Thanks, Jaime!

## Recent Comments

- Carlos Ungil on How science and science communication really work: coronavirus edition
- Dale Lehman on A new hot hand paradox
- Matt Skaggs on A new hot hand paradox
- Bob Carpenter on Further formalization of the “multiverse” idea in statistical modeling
- Andrew on A new hot hand paradox
- Tom Passin on A new hot hand paradox
- A new hot hand paradox « Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science on Handy statistical lexicon
- Chris on It’s not matching
*or*regression, it’s matching*and*regression. - Andre on Are female scientists worse mentors? This study pretends to know
- Ryan Bernstein on Further formalization of the “multiverse” idea in statistical modeling
- Max on Greek statistician is in trouble for . . . telling the truth!
- gec on Further formalization of the “multiverse” idea in statistical modeling
- Martha (Smith) on Greek statistician is in trouble for . . . telling the truth!
- Ryan Bernstein on Further formalization of the “multiverse” idea in statistical modeling
- Bob Carpenter on Further formalization of the “multiverse” idea in statistical modeling
- gec on Greek statistician is in trouble for . . . telling the truth!
- Anoneuoid on Further formalization of the “multiverse” idea in statistical modeling
- Further formalization of the “multiverse” idea in statistical modeling « Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science on It’s not matching
*or*regression, it’s matching*and*regression. - Andrew on Are female scientists worse mentors? This study pretends to know
- anon on Follow-up on yesterday’s posts: some maps are less misleading than others.

## Categories

Would you settle for John Cheever?

For this particular post, Carver’s what I need. Or, failing that, Gordon Lish.

Wouldn’t that be the same photo?