In the inbox today, under the header, “Hidden Costs behind Milk & Dairy Consumption (video)”:

Hey Professor Gelman,

Our site’s production team recently released a short video uncovering the local and global impact that milk has on our lives.

After spending some time on your posts, I noticed you talked about dairy products and milk so I thought I’d email you. Are you the correct person to contact in regards to the content on the site?

If so, let me know if you’re interested in checking out the video.

Thanks,

Emily S.

Hmmm . . . I guess I do talk a lot about dairy products and milk on this site!

Well, what are the hidden costs?!?!?

The cost of the red wine to go with the brie?

They don’t call you Andrew Milkman for no reason.

Might Big Data have something to do with this?

Daisy-an statistics?

Andrew does talk about milk a surprising amount. Nearly 200 hits according to Google query [milk site:andrewgelman.com]. About the same number as for butter.

Does Andrew have a dairy fetish?

No, it turns out he talks about everything a lot. Coke has roughly the same number of hits (didn’t check if any were cocaine).

On the other hand, only 8 hits for brandy (some of them related to names), but 400 for wine.

I’m disappointed that Earl Weaver gets over 100 hits, but Sparky Anderson has zero.

Hi Andrew:

We notice you talk a lot about p-values (1,390) but our sentiment analysis also shows you are deeply distraught by them. Not surprisingly you also talk a lot about drugs (834).

It’s not too late to seek help. We at Frequentist Psychologists have a great deal of experience with cases like yours. Indeed, our research shows how abandoning the prior and forgetting about the posterior cures p-value anxiety. We are 95% sure, or your money back!

So what are you waiting for? Call 1800-HELPBAYES

Yours

Frequentist Psychologists

Live drug free, love p-values (TM)

The belief is strong that this might come to the aid of satisfying the cravings of the not so secret p-value envy of Bayesians who occasionally let it slip that, deep down “A Bayesian Wants Everybody Else to be a Non-Bayesian!” (See Deconstructing Gelman: http://errorstatistics.com/2012/10/05/deconstructing-gelman-part-1-a-bayesian-wants-everybody-else-to-be-a-non-bayesian/)

@Freq. in exile

I think you just uncovered a classic “The Bayesian of Seville” paradox.

Bertrand Russell would be proud.

Gelman needs to call 1800-HELPBAYES now!

Freq Psychs:

Hurry! (first minute free): Alpha Confidence (type 1 & 2) live phone chat: 1900 LUV-PVAL!

Pwr up ur life! Beta elixir.

Get rid of null! Gain confidence!!!

1800 BYE-BAYES

Freq Psychs:

LIVE STAT CHAT! Best error bounds! NO prior rqd; All models max/mini. 1900 PWR-CURV

I recently got a spam mail from a Mechanical Engineering graduate. He’s from China, he has studied in Switzerland, and asked me about an internship in my “firm”.

Weird.

I’m an epidemiologist and don’t have a firm of any sort.

Good to see you aren’t easily cowed by cheesy spammers!

I see you’re milking it for all its worth.

I’m guessing that this cheesy humour could go on until the cows come home